V1.Chapter 1952
U.S.A.
AIA headquarters.
When receiving Xia Xiaolan's personal complaint and protest, AIA did not attract attention. It was more angry.
Is a Chinese student questioning AIA's judgment?
What gives Chinese students courage? Is it Kissinger, a partner of GMP New York firm.
So they informed Mond Dawson.
If Chinese students and Kissinger want to make things big, AIA is not afraid to invade other people's designs. It is not AIA that loses face. Kissinger will only lose more face if he refuses to admit his mistake.
Of course, out of caution, AIA asked mund about this and confirmed Lisa's response to the lawsuit.
Lisa is naturally full of confidence, insists that it is her own work, will not compromise with the "thief", and firmly believes that the judiciary will give her a fair judgment.
Angry to angry, AIA ignored this protest letter.
AIA is very busy. Now that it has decided to go to court, wait for the court to pronounce.
But only two days later, AIA received a second letter of complaint and protest.
This letter is much heavier than the first one - it came from Cornell Institute of architecture. The joint protest letter led by Professor McCarthy sprayed AIA well.
The letter said that AIA's judgment had seriously affected Xia Xiaolan's personal reputation and caused losses to the reputation of Cornell Institute of architecture. AIA was asked to withdraw its reckless judgment and apologize for the matter.
Huh?!
What the hell?
The personal reputation of Chinese students can be justified. Although AIA does not think that a Chinese student can have much reputation, has it caused a loss to the reputation of Cornell Institute of architecture?
"Is this Cornell's student?"
"One year as an exchange student at Cornell School of architecture."
So, just an exchange student, Cornell School of architecture is crazy!
Every year, many students will graduate from Cornell University. Under the halo of famous universities, some people will still choose to commit crimes. Does the school have to stand up and support their students every time?
So what's different about this Chinese student.
AIA headquarters feels a little wrong.
After checking, I found that although Xia Xiaolan was an exchange student who had only stayed at Cornell Institute of architecture for one year, she was not unknown in this year.
She is a student who can handle the most eccentric and strict professor.
Other students can only get an A. she got an a + in the same class!
She led the group to participate in the C · w architectural design competition jointly held by the school of architecture and Wilson Hotel. Although it was only a small-scale competition, it was difficult for her to stand out from senior competitors and win the championship considering that she was only a sophomore at that time.
The champion, let her be recommended to GMP firm internship.
During the internship, she participated in the design of the Washington branch of Wilson Hotel and the renovation of the theater on Broadway, which is her second project in GMP.
This is a beautiful resume.
Following this path, she can stand out in the architectural circle of New York in less than two years.
The influence of New York metropolis radiates all over the United States, and the United States affects the whole world, so it is really a promising new architect!
GMP New York office wants to promote this newcomer to become famous at a faster speed——
Damn it, she is also a "equal rights fighter". In the college, she insisted that Mrs. Dawson apologize for discriminating against Chinese students.
Which Mrs. Dawson?
Raymond Dawson's wife.
Hell, if you check here, you know something's wrong.
The judgment of the jury of "AIA supernova architect" is not so firm. Anyway, because Xia Xiaolan and the Dawson family had a contradiction in the past, what Monde said at the beginning may not be so pertinent.
Everyone has his own selfishness.
Meng de probably disliked the Chinese student and questioned her professional level.
As a Pritzker Architecture Award winner, Mond has no problem doing so.
Finally, she was disqualified and decided that her work belonged to Lisa, a female architect, but the jury of AIA!
This is more embarrassing. AIA may have carried the pot for Mond Dawson.
How could a Chinese student who came to be an exchange student sign a letter of protest if he did not have great talent and was not excellent enough to make the professors of Cornell Institute of architecture love talents?
The jury is a little difficult now.
Admit you're wrong?
Then AIA will lose its credibility.
AIA's indiscretion will lead to ridicule.
Mund didn't do anything, but AIA made a mistake... Even if you put everything on mund and Lisa, AIA has no light:
"Mr. Raymond Dawson is the vice chairman of AIA jury."
How does AIA choose?
AIA wanted to hide it for Mond.
Before, I felt that there was no industry wide notification, which left face for the GMP firm. Now I'm a little lucky. If the two sides do not completely tear their faces, there is still the possibility of relaxation.
"Perhaps Kissinger should be invited to the headquarters for a talk."
You don't have to go through the judicial process. How about reconciliation between the two sides?
AIA revalidates the design ownership of the theater renovation scheme. If it really belongs to Xia Xiaolan, they can quietly add this work to this year's "AIA supernova architect" selection... No, it's too conspicuous to rejoin this year. Maybe next year, when AIA holds the second supernova architect selection, they can give Xia Xiaolan a certain score.
Anyway, she is still several years away from the age limit of 28 set by "AIA supernova architect". She can wait until she is more confident to impact this award.
There were still fierce discussions within AIA. Before they could talk to Kissinger about the terms of reconciliation, a protest letter from Huaqing University was delivered.
Refining a lot of diplomatic words, the general meaning is: Huaqing University, one of the highest universities in China, aims to cultivate professionals from all walks of life. The school never lowers the standards for students' professional level and has very high requirements for students' professional ethics
A more concise summary:
AIA wronged Xia Xiaolan.
AIA must find out the truth and correct this mistake.
AIA should apologize to Xia Xiaolan and restore Xia Xiaolan's personal reputation.
Well, the school of architecture of Cornell University spoke for Xia Xiaolan. It's not surprising that Huaqing University said so. Seriously, this is no longer controllable. If a student can make two schools speak for her, her personal quality is absolutely excellent.
Personal quality here not only refers to professional ability, but also professional ethics.
If she is a student who is easy to find stains, and the school is not full and has nothing to do, she should take a risk to stand out for her.
With the letter of protest from Huaqing university came the Chinese Architectural Society.
"... he claims to be a director of the Chinese Architectural Society and hopes to talk to the chairman of the jury."
Shit！
How can AIA stand such a bad thing.
As you know, when Mond Dawson said to himself that he had a good time talking with Lisa, everyone should not hear him.
AIA is not a court. Why should it decide the ownership of works for others?
AIA just award!
The works declared by GMP firm may not win the supernova architect Award... Even if she wins, Lisa feels unfair and can take Xia Xiaolan and GMP to court.
"Cut the director's phone..."
AIA headquarters.
When receiving Xia Xiaolan's personal complaint and protest, AIA did not attract attention. It was more angry.
Is a Chinese student questioning AIA's judgment?
What gives Chinese students courage? Is it Kissinger, a partner of GMP New York firm.
So they informed Mond Dawson.
If Chinese students and Kissinger want to make things big, AIA is not afraid to invade other people's designs. It is not AIA that loses face. Kissinger will only lose more face if he refuses to admit his mistake.
Of course, out of caution, AIA asked mund about this and confirmed Lisa's response to the lawsuit.
Lisa is naturally full of confidence, insists that it is her own work, will not compromise with the "thief", and firmly believes that the judiciary will give her a fair judgment.
Angry to angry, AIA ignored this protest letter.
AIA is very busy. Now that it has decided to go to court, wait for the court to pronounce.
But only two days later, AIA received a second letter of complaint and protest.
This letter is much heavier than the first one - it came from Cornell Institute of architecture. The joint protest letter led by Professor McCarthy sprayed AIA well.
The letter said that AIA's judgment had seriously affected Xia Xiaolan's personal reputation and caused losses to the reputation of Cornell Institute of architecture. AIA was asked to withdraw its reckless judgment and apologize for the matter.
Huh?!
What the hell?
The personal reputation of Chinese students can be justified. Although AIA does not think that a Chinese student can have much reputation, has it caused a loss to the reputation of Cornell Institute of architecture?
"Is this Cornell's student?"
"One year as an exchange student at Cornell School of architecture."
So, just an exchange student, Cornell School of architecture is crazy!
Every year, many students will graduate from Cornell University. Under the halo of famous universities, some people will still choose to commit crimes. Does the school have to stand up and support their students every time?
So what's different about this Chinese student.
AIA headquarters feels a little wrong.
After checking, I found that although Xia Xiaolan was an exchange student who had only stayed at Cornell Institute of architecture for one year, she was not unknown in this year.
She is a student who can handle the most eccentric and strict professor.
Other students can only get an A. she got an a + in the same class!
She led the group to participate in the C · w architectural design competition jointly held by the school of architecture and Wilson Hotel. Although it was only a small-scale competition, it was difficult for her to stand out from senior competitors and win the championship considering that she was only a sophomore at that time.
The champion, let her be recommended to GMP firm internship.
During the internship, she participated in the design of the Washington branch of Wilson Hotel and the renovation of the theater on Broadway, which is her second project in GMP.
This is a beautiful resume.
Following this path, she can stand out in the architectural circle of New York in less than two years.
The influence of New York metropolis radiates all over the United States, and the United States affects the whole world, so it is really a promising new architect!
GMP New York office wants to promote this newcomer to become famous at a faster speed——
Damn it, she is also a "equal rights fighter". In the college, she insisted that Mrs. Dawson apologize for discriminating against Chinese students.
Which Mrs. Dawson?
Raymond Dawson's wife.
Hell, if you check here, you know something's wrong.
The judgment of the jury of "AIA supernova architect" is not so firm. Anyway, because Xia Xiaolan and the Dawson family had a contradiction in the past, what Monde said at the beginning may not be so pertinent.
Everyone has his own selfishness.
Meng de probably disliked the Chinese student and questioned her professional level.
As a Pritzker Architecture Award winner, Mond has no problem doing so.
Finally, she was disqualified and decided that her work belonged to Lisa, a female architect, but the jury of AIA!
This is more embarrassing. AIA may have carried the pot for Mond Dawson.
How could a Chinese student who came to be an exchange student sign a letter of protest if he did not have great talent and was not excellent enough to make the professors of Cornell Institute of architecture love talents?
The jury is a little difficult now.
Admit you're wrong?
Then AIA will lose its credibility.
AIA's indiscretion will lead to ridicule.
Mund didn't do anything, but AIA made a mistake... Even if you put everything on mund and Lisa, AIA has no light:
"Mr. Raymond Dawson is the vice chairman of AIA jury."
How does AIA choose?
AIA wanted to hide it for Mond.
Before, I felt that there was no industry wide notification, which left face for the GMP firm. Now I'm a little lucky. If the two sides do not completely tear their faces, there is still the possibility of relaxation.
"Perhaps Kissinger should be invited to the headquarters for a talk."
You don't have to go through the judicial process. How about reconciliation between the two sides?
AIA revalidates the design ownership of the theater renovation scheme. If it really belongs to Xia Xiaolan, they can quietly add this work to this year's "AIA supernova architect" selection... No, it's too conspicuous to rejoin this year. Maybe next year, when AIA holds the second supernova architect selection, they can give Xia Xiaolan a certain score.
Anyway, she is still several years away from the age limit of 28 set by "AIA supernova architect". She can wait until she is more confident to impact this award.
There were still fierce discussions within AIA. Before they could talk to Kissinger about the terms of reconciliation, a protest letter from Huaqing University was delivered.
Refining a lot of diplomatic words, the general meaning is: Huaqing University, one of the highest universities in China, aims to cultivate professionals from all walks of life. The school never lowers the standards for students' professional level and has very high requirements for students' professional ethics
A more concise summary:
AIA wronged Xia Xiaolan.
AIA must find out the truth and correct this mistake.
AIA should apologize to Xia Xiaolan and restore Xia Xiaolan's personal reputation.
Well, the school of architecture of Cornell University spoke for Xia Xiaolan. It's not surprising that Huaqing University said so. Seriously, this is no longer controllable. If a student can make two schools speak for her, her personal quality is absolutely excellent.
Personal quality here not only refers to professional ability, but also professional ethics.
If she is a student who is easy to find stains, and the school is not full and has nothing to do, she should take a risk to stand out for her.
With the letter of protest from Huaqing university came the Chinese Architectural Society.
"... he claims to be a director of the Chinese Architectural Society and hopes to talk to the chairman of the jury."
Shit！
How can AIA stand such a bad thing.
As you know, when Mond Dawson said to himself that he had a good time talking with Lisa, everyone should not hear him.
AIA is not a court. Why should it decide the ownership of works for others?
AIA just award!
The works declared by GMP firm may not win the supernova architect Award... Even if she wins, Lisa feels unfair and can take Xia Xiaolan and GMP to court.
"Cut the director's phone..."
RECENTLY UPDATES
Action
Action
Action
Drama
Action
Drama
Fantasy
Action