V1.Chapter 2000

"Mr. mond, you are a well-known architect worth learning from. You have made great achievements in the field of architecture, which is the model goal I yearn for. It is difficult for students like me to have any intersection with well-known architects like you. If you hadn't been lucky enough to be a classmate with your daughter for a year, this intersection would be almost impossible, I'm standing a few meters away from you now. In fact, compared with the position you've struggled for years, my position is the distance from China to the United States and the difference between China's architectural circle and the world's mainstream architectural circle. I'm not much in China's architectural circle. How can I compare with you, the Pritzker Architectural Award winner? "

Xia Xiaolan looked straight at Mond Dawson.

Mund had two collections of works in front of him, and he had not yet started to look through them.

But Eric sent those to the jury. The jury members are already watching them.

The jury's aesthetic appreciation of architectural works is no higher than that of a group of people outside the court. Everyone is not professional and can only be appreciated from the perspective of ordinary people.

Wow, wow——

This is the sound of turning copper plate color printing paper.

"Of course I can't compare with you, but I will work hard in this direction. I'm only 22 years old. It's normal to compare with you now. By the time I'm 32 and 42, I may be qualified to talk to you as an equal... The premise is that I have the opportunity not to be excluded from the international architectural circle because of the slander of others!"

"The most ironic thing about this infringement case is not that the defendant stigmatizes me, but that in the United States, a country that advocates equal rights, someone will convict me first with a fixed impression!"

"The appearance is given by my parents. It just conforms to the aesthetics of some people. It doesn't mean I shouldn't work hard."

"Being Chinese doesn't mean my IQ should be lower than others. How many Americans have been inspired by the American dream? Everyone has the opportunity to create miracles. Why is it that the excellence of a Chinese person will be questioned? "

"Attacking a woman with her private life is the most shameless and obscene means. What's the meaning of forcing the witness to admit that he likes me in court? Like does not mean desire, like does not mean that he should lose the most basic moral standards and will perjure for me! "

"I said these words at the door of the court this morning. I hope those who guard at the door of the court and enthusiastically pay attention to the lawsuit can be a good 'judge', who has better works and who has more strength to make a 'theater renovation plan'. I hope all jury members can participate in the judgment together. Your approval may not determine the outcome of the lawsuit, but I believe you will have your own judgment! "

"As for Mr. Raymond Dawson, judging from your professional perspective, who is more powerful, Lisa and I? If Lisa is not as good as me, why should I invade a female architect whose strength is low and whose level is not as good as mine? "

"It is said that Mr. Mond expressed doubts to the AIA supernova architect jury. You once talked with the defendant Ms. Lisa at the theater construction site. After a conversation, you can determine that Lisa is the creator of the scheme - can you swear by your reputation and make a fair evaluation? Did you see the defendant create this plan with your own eyes? "

Buzzing.

The jury was talking loudly.

Finally, a jury spoke:

"I think Mond needs to answer her question."

"Mond should judge in court."

"She is qualified to ask Mond to do so."

Jury members have no legal background. They are old and young, male and female. They are all composed of ordinary people randomly selected.

Some people say that the jury system of the common law system has led to the protracted Anti Japanese litigation and violated the principle of litigation efficiency in modern society. And because the jury has no legal background and doesn't understand the legal regulations, their judgment and determination of the case are not based on rigorous logical reasoning, but on the so-called "sense of social justice" - that's why Lisa wants to create news and public opinion.

It's hard to say what kind of news brainwashing these jurors had undergone before they were selected.

The judge ruled that Xia Xiaolan won the lawsuit. If the jury disagreed, the lawsuit would be a protracted war.

The jury system has been questioned all the time, but it has been implemented all the time, because these ordinary people selected at random have effectively prevented judges from abusing their judicial power! Temporary formation, random selection and isolation after the event are the basic rules of the jury. This system can also effectively prevent judicial corruption... It's no use just bribing judges. If the judge decides a case is too absurd, these jury members are the last line of defense!

It sounds strange that the trial bias must be unfair, and the jury can speak!

Of course, you can get sympathy points by selling to the jury. Like Xia Xiaolan, you can win respect by relying on calm self-confidence.

People who have done bad things will feel guilty, panic, bluff and aggressive.

The jury went through morning and afternoon trials, and they had their own judgment.

They asked Mond to answer the question!

Is the so-called professional barrier really so strong?

They want to see if the works selected from the eyes of ordinary people are completely opposite to those selected by the Pritzker Architecture Award winner - Xia Xiaolan, a Chinese female student, insists on going to the United States to file a lawsuit. There are so many American witnesses willing to testify for her in court. Won't they be bribed.

The partner of GMP testified.

Cornell's senior testified.

Cornell's Professor testified.

The rich man testified.

Lisa's witness is a little weak by comparison.

Mrs. Wilson was overwhelmed by Harold's court appearance before she even had time to say too much.

In front of the judge are also two open collections of works.

"Mr. Raymond Dawson, please answer the plaintiff's questions and make your own judgment as a professional."

The judge not only judged who had a higher level of work, but also sent the original works provided by Xia Xiaolan and Lisa to Mond Dawson.

Because the time of the two originals is too close, it is even difficult to distinguish which is the first and which is the last in the technical appraisal.

What about the profession?

Can Raymond Dawson judge according to the idea of the design drawing?

There are differences between original and copy, which can only be judged by master figures.

If Raymond Dawson makes a judgment according to the law, the court can only consult other master architects. Of course, he can refuse the appraisal or make random appraisal. Then he should pray that Lisa can "create" a steady stream of good works in the future, and Xia Xiaolan will never design any works again... Or it will be too humiliating.

What would mund choose?

Xia Xiaolan smiled at him.

Silence these days, is to the current general!

She was afraid that Mond would not be a witness to Lisa.

Fortunately, Mond came.

Will Mond take risks, correct Lisa's name and nail Xia Xiaolan to death, or just stop and brake in time?

Meng de finally reached out and opened the two collections of works in front of him. The court was quiet and no one bothered him - his heart must be painful. He had seen Xia Xiaolan's collection for a long time, but he had to pretend to see it for the first time!