“Continue talking.” Boss Zhang urged impatiently.
“Let’s first recall the pilot data that Dr. Dong gave us.” Dr. Xie Wanying’s words are always orderly.
Lao Zhang was speechless for a moment.
When you listen to other people’s speeches, you have to remember what they say. As an academic, laying out data and recording data is the first thing. Remember that the data list that others talk about reflects your academic level.
After everyone else thought about this, they all immediately shut up like a boss.
Dean Bai patted his thigh and felt happy.
It is rumored that only Dr. Xie can cure the big devil. Now it seems to be somewhat true.
Time was tight, so Dr. Xie Wanying reviewed Dr. Dong's lecture on behalf of everyone: "Dr. Dong listed the clinical pathway research data on inpatients with shingles carried out in a department of their dermatology hospital. The control group was the group that did not enter the clinical pathway, and the two groups Data comparison shows that the average number of days of hospitalization in the control group is significantly longer than that in the clinical pathway group, which is four to seven days, showing that the clinical pathway group has advantages in terms of inpatient bed turnover rate and reducing the medical burden on patients."
Having survey data listed is better than having nothing in plastic surgery. Dean Bai puffed up his chest and felt more confident.
“Clinical pathways are created and developed abroad and introduced into domestic hospitals for pilot purposes. They are used as quality control tools.” Dr. Xie Wanying suddenly reiterated the theme of today’s meeting.
Dean Bai’s eyelids jumped up.
The meaning of quality control system has been explained in detail in a large chapter in the previous article.
“I have not yet seen the role of clinical pathways in quality control in Dr. Dong’s speech,” said Dr. Xie Wanying.
A group of big guys at the back couldn't help it: Is my colleague from the dermatology hospital going off-topic in his speech? !
First of all, it must be said that the clinical pathway was not used as a quality control tool when it was first created. It was criticized by many people because it was put into existence to save the increasingly uncontrollable medical expenses.
The use of quality control in clinical pathways can be said to refute the above one-sided statement: to control medical expenses at the expense of patient interests? Sorry, the clinical path does not take the blame.
For example, when it was proposed above that medical reform is to reduce costs and increase efficiency, a large number of people angrily said: How can it be possible to reduce medical expenses and at the same time improve the interests of patients? What these people say seems to be logical on the surface, but in fact they ignore a key point in management: the resources and time wasted by ineffective work must be eliminated.
Another profound connotation of ineffectiveness in management science is disorder.
The name of the clinical path is a road designated for you to take, such as dividing traffic into separate lanes for motor vehicles, turning disorderly mixed traffic flow into orderly classified traffic flow, thereby reducing costs and increasing efficiency.
So the next question naturally becomes how to determine which correct path is the clinical path, which I think is part of quality control.
Quality control can eliminate ineffective things in the clinical pathway and leave effective things.
Who will do this quality control and how will it be reflected? According to the quality control system mentioned earlier, it should be reflected.
This matter sounds a bit abstract. Could it be that the speech of plastic surgery needs to be examined in the context of leadership speeches?
Let’s talk about a specific task in traditional quality control called medical record review.
Taking this as an example, clinical pathways should also require standardized clinical pathway medical records. First, it can save medical staff time in writing medical records. Second, further standardized medical record writing can make it easier for superiors to check for omissions.
These details were not covered by the dermatology hospital during the pilot program.
The big guys in the field heard it: the pilot work done by the dermatology hospital was equivalent to getting a new tool. The result was that they didn’t know how to use it in detail and where it was used in detail. They could only do some superficial work on generalizations. No wonder. Called out by Dr. Xie for going off topic.
The eyes of everyone in the audience were as round as those of the previous leader, Mr. Lin.
Pragmatically speaking, the results of pilot projects like the Dermatology Hospital are normal. It is inevitable to encounter bumps and detours when you start to contact new things, and other units cannot avoid it.
Because of this, it further reflects that the academic level of Dr. Xie Wanying’s topic is absolutely amazing~
Thank you for your support, good night, dear friends~
