Chapter 489： Perfect score
ads_wz_txt;
Make a comeback with 489 perfect scores
Thirteen professional media immediately wrote film reviews after the premiere, which can definitely be called the attention of the public! You should know that there are currently about forty professional film magazines in North America. Of course, in addition to these professional film media, other comprehensive media have more reports, but they will not be in a hurry to write film reviews after the premiere, but will write reviews after the premiere weekend or the weekend of the second week. , So that the audience can have more buffer time.
After the premiere of "Schindler's List", thirteen professional media commented frenzy, and it can be seen that professional film critics can't wait to express their inner feelings about the film after watching the film. This also proves from the side the fact that there are countless people watching the movie before the movie is released.
Although there are many comments, how about the content? It is praise or criticism, success or failure, positive or negative...
Among the first batch of thirteen media comments, Roger Ebert, who works for the Chicago Sun, unexpectedly took the lead in expressing his views on movies, not the Los Angeles Times or the New York Times. It's really surprising that the Hollywood Reporter or Variety Show is actually the Chicago Sun.
Although the "Chicago Sun" is not one of the four major media in the film industry, Roger has the top level in the industry as a film critic. Even film critics and colleagues have a good reputation for Roger. In other words, Authority! As the first film critic ever to win the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism, his film reviews have been published in more than two hundred newspapers around the world, and he even has his own film critic program. It can be said that his influence is Few people can match the top-notch presence in the industry.
The reason why Roger has such a high degree of authority'sex' is because of his aesthetic standards. He describes his way of commenting on movies as "relative rather than absolute..." He allows himself to comment on movies as a movie audience, so Always consider the overall value of the film, including artistic value, commercial value, viewing value, etc. In other words, he will not blindly pursue artistic films and belittle commercial films, but he will not place too much emphasis on technical **** and ignore entertainment 'sex'.
Generally speaking, he assigns high-quality movies with four stars, and the worst movies with half a star, unless the movie is "no artistic'sexual'" or "morally disgusting" will give zero. Stars.
Roger once made such remarks in the 21st century, which vividly described his film critic standards, "When you asked me'Hellboy (), is there any'color'", my answer is, If the score is between four points, if the superman is four points, then the hellboy can score three points, and the punishment (the.) is two points."
In addition, Roger insisted that if he did not read the comments, it would not make any sense to just look at his ratings, because his ratings and comments would be very mismatched. For example, "The Manson family (the. He gave the movie three stars because the film achieved the original purpose of filming, but he would not recommend this movie because it is not a movie worthy of the audience to watch. work.
Roger's commentary style has earned him a place in the fiercely competitive film critic industry, and his authoritative ‘sex’ has also been recognized by many audiences. This time, Roger gave his own comments on "Schindler's List" in the first place. For this movie, Roger gave a four-star rating. If judged on a hundred-point scale, he would give A hundred points, and the recommendation index is also four stars. There is no doubt that Roger gave all the compliments to "Schindler's List"!
"If Oscar Schindler is a traditional hero who fights for his beliefs, it will be easier to understand him. But in fact, he is a flawed person, alcoholic, and Gambling, playing with emotions, greed, luxury, so this made his people a mystery.
At the beginning of the Second World War, he saw the opportunity and went to Krakow under Nazi occupation to open a factory and hire Jews to work for him at extremely low wages. His goal was to become a millionaire. When the war was about to end, he risked his life and sacrificed his personal wealth to save the Jews; he deceived the Nazis for several months and set up a fictional military factory.
Why did he change? What happened that turned him from a victimizer to a humanitarian? The movie "Schindler's List" did not attempt to answer this question at all. This must be attributed to Steven One Spielberg. Because any answer may be too simple, it would be an insult to Schindler's life.
The Holocaust is a huge engine of evil, driven by racism and fanaticism. But Schindler defeated it with wisdom in his own small corner. However, he seemed to have no plan at all. He acted with'sex' purely on impulse, and even he himself couldn't completely. 'Figure out' these. This is Spielberg's best work so far. He restores the truth of the Holocaust and the miracle that Schindler created. In this process, he did not resort to those simple narrative methods.
The film is 184 minutes long, and like all great film works, it still looks too short.
At the beginning of the film, Schindler, played by Liam Nissen, appeared on the stage. He was a tall man and gave people a sense of self-prestige. He was well-dressed and often lingered at night. He was a Nazi officer and the'female' children around them. He bought caviar and elephant soldiers. He also liked to take photos with senior officers. He proudly pinned the Nazi party emblem on his clothes. He also eats well on the black market and can get nylon, cigarettes and brandy. The authorities are happy to help him open a factory to make kitchenware for the military cooking class. He is also very happy to hire Jews, thinking that their wages are lower than the ‘Bo’s’, so that he can make a fortune.
Schindler's genius lies in bribery, conspiracy, and deception. He didn't know anything about operating a factory, so he found the Jewish accountant Isaac Stein, played by Ben Kingsley, to take charge of this. Steyn walked the streets of Krakow, hiring Jewish recognition for Schindler's factory. Because this is a protected military-industrial enterprise, if you can work there, you can save your life.
Spielberg handled the relationship between Schindler and Steyn very delicately. When the war began, Schindler only wanted to make money, but at the end of the film review, he only wanted to save the'his' Jews. We know that Steyn is very clear about what's going on here, but we have never seen a scene of the two talking about it in the film; this may be because under the circumstances, talking loudly and talking about certain things might call for a murder. disaster.
This kind of delicacy is where Spielberg's strength runs through the film. The script of this film is adapted from a novel by Thomas Kennelly by Steven Zerian. It has no contrived drama at all. On the contrary, Spielberg chose a series of events and presented them clearly and without error. Deliberately'manipulate' emotional issues. Seeing these times, we also understand how secret Schindler and his plan are.
He also presented the massacre before us in a vivid and terrifying way. In the movie, the A'mon-Goss Nazi officer, played by Hugo-Lancaster, is the best case study of evil stupidity. He stood on the Yantai of his villa, overlooking the concentration camp, shooting and killing Jews at will just to practice marksmanship. And Schindler was able to persuade him to give up this habit by catering to his vanity, which Schindler did so obvious, almost as if he was insulting him.
Goss belongs to the kind of fragile hypocrisy who strives to maintain a certain ideal, but excludes himself; on the one hand, he preaches the killing of Jews; on the other hand, he chooses the character played by Alberts-Davidz Helen, the Jew, was a servant girl and fell in love with her. Her compatriots are being destroyed, but she is spared because of his impulsive love. He is not surprised to face such a situation. In his view, his personal needs are more important than right and wrong, survival and destruction.
The film uses black and white photography, and many of the locations used are the actual locations where the scenes were staged. Spielberg shows us how Schindler interacted with the madness of the Nazi system. He bribed, he coaxed, he bragged, and he was finally not seen through. In one of the most daring passages of the film, the train full of his hired workers mistakenly looked at Auschwitz. Schindler personally went to the death camp and boldly persuaded the administrator to let the Jews go and remove them from death. Edge was rescued and put on a train bound for his factory.
The most surprising thing about this film is that Spielberg has served the story so completely. The film can perform "color", write "color", and lead "color", and it also looks very "color". Each individual scene is a masterpiece of art director, photography, special effects, and management of extras. But Spielberg himself, with his outstanding personal style, has many gorgeous shots that deliberately made us pay attention to and remembered in his previous works, but this time he disappeared in his works. Nissen, Kingsley, Lancaster and other actors did not have that kind of dazzling performance. All of them just worked for the same goal.
At the end of the movie, there is a passage full of overwhelming ‘sex’ emotional impact. Those who were rescued by Schindler appeared in person. We learned that Schindler’s Jews and their descendants now have 6,000 people, UU reading and the entire ‘Bo’land’s Jews are only 4,000. This seems to be telling us an obvious truth. Schindler has done more to save Jews than a country. But this conclusion is too simple. The message of this film is that in the face of the Holocaust, one person did certain things, while others were insensitive.
The French writer Gustave Flaubert once wrote that he didn't like'Uncle Tom's cabin' because the author kept preaching against slavery.'Do you have to comment on slavery? , He asked,'Describe it; that's enough.' He added,'The author writes a book' must be like the God in the universe, ubiquitous but imperceptible. This can also be used. On Spielberg, the author of the film.
He described the evil of the Holocaust, and he told an incredible story about how certain people who should have been victims survived. In this process, he did not use the ‘fancy’ tricks of the film industry, those directing and dramatic ‘sexual’ tactics that only evoked ordinary drama-like reactions. In this movie, you can't perceive Spielberg's existence, but in every shot, his restraint and ‘excitement’ are everywhere. "
(Unfinished to be continued. If you like this work, you are welcome to read it and vote for a monthly pass. Your support is the biggest motivation for me to continue to create.
Make a comeback with 489 perfect scores
Thirteen professional media immediately wrote film reviews after the premiere, which can definitely be called the attention of the public! You should know that there are currently about forty professional film magazines in North America. Of course, in addition to these professional film media, other comprehensive media have more reports, but they will not be in a hurry to write film reviews after the premiere, but will write reviews after the premiere weekend or the weekend of the second week. , So that the audience can have more buffer time.
After the premiere of "Schindler's List", thirteen professional media commented frenzy, and it can be seen that professional film critics can't wait to express their inner feelings about the film after watching the film. This also proves from the side the fact that there are countless people watching the movie before the movie is released.
Although there are many comments, how about the content? It is praise or criticism, success or failure, positive or negative...
Among the first batch of thirteen media comments, Roger Ebert, who works for the Chicago Sun, unexpectedly took the lead in expressing his views on movies, not the Los Angeles Times or the New York Times. It's really surprising that the Hollywood Reporter or Variety Show is actually the Chicago Sun.
Although the "Chicago Sun" is not one of the four major media in the film industry, Roger has the top level in the industry as a film critic. Even film critics and colleagues have a good reputation for Roger. In other words, Authority! As the first film critic ever to win the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism, his film reviews have been published in more than two hundred newspapers around the world, and he even has his own film critic program. It can be said that his influence is Few people can match the top-notch presence in the industry.
The reason why Roger has such a high degree of authority'sex' is because of his aesthetic standards. He describes his way of commenting on movies as "relative rather than absolute..." He allows himself to comment on movies as a movie audience, so Always consider the overall value of the film, including artistic value, commercial value, viewing value, etc. In other words, he will not blindly pursue artistic films and belittle commercial films, but he will not place too much emphasis on technical **** and ignore entertainment 'sex'.
Generally speaking, he assigns high-quality movies with four stars, and the worst movies with half a star, unless the movie is "no artistic'sexual'" or "morally disgusting" will give zero. Stars.
Roger once made such remarks in the 21st century, which vividly described his film critic standards, "When you asked me'Hellboy (), is there any'color'", my answer is, If the score is between four points, if the superman is four points, then the hellboy can score three points, and the punishment (the.) is two points."
In addition, Roger insisted that if he did not read the comments, it would not make any sense to just look at his ratings, because his ratings and comments would be very mismatched. For example, "The Manson family (the. He gave the movie three stars because the film achieved the original purpose of filming, but he would not recommend this movie because it is not a movie worthy of the audience to watch. work.
Roger's commentary style has earned him a place in the fiercely competitive film critic industry, and his authoritative ‘sex’ has also been recognized by many audiences. This time, Roger gave his own comments on "Schindler's List" in the first place. For this movie, Roger gave a four-star rating. If judged on a hundred-point scale, he would give A hundred points, and the recommendation index is also four stars. There is no doubt that Roger gave all the compliments to "Schindler's List"!
"If Oscar Schindler is a traditional hero who fights for his beliefs, it will be easier to understand him. But in fact, he is a flawed person, alcoholic, and Gambling, playing with emotions, greed, luxury, so this made his people a mystery.
At the beginning of the Second World War, he saw the opportunity and went to Krakow under Nazi occupation to open a factory and hire Jews to work for him at extremely low wages. His goal was to become a millionaire. When the war was about to end, he risked his life and sacrificed his personal wealth to save the Jews; he deceived the Nazis for several months and set up a fictional military factory.
Why did he change? What happened that turned him from a victimizer to a humanitarian? The movie "Schindler's List" did not attempt to answer this question at all. This must be attributed to Steven One Spielberg. Because any answer may be too simple, it would be an insult to Schindler's life.
The Holocaust is a huge engine of evil, driven by racism and fanaticism. But Schindler defeated it with wisdom in his own small corner. However, he seemed to have no plan at all. He acted with'sex' purely on impulse, and even he himself couldn't completely. 'Figure out' these. This is Spielberg's best work so far. He restores the truth of the Holocaust and the miracle that Schindler created. In this process, he did not resort to those simple narrative methods.
The film is 184 minutes long, and like all great film works, it still looks too short.
At the beginning of the film, Schindler, played by Liam Nissen, appeared on the stage. He was a tall man and gave people a sense of self-prestige. He was well-dressed and often lingered at night. He was a Nazi officer and the'female' children around them. He bought caviar and elephant soldiers. He also liked to take photos with senior officers. He proudly pinned the Nazi party emblem on his clothes. He also eats well on the black market and can get nylon, cigarettes and brandy. The authorities are happy to help him open a factory to make kitchenware for the military cooking class. He is also very happy to hire Jews, thinking that their wages are lower than the ‘Bo’s’, so that he can make a fortune.
Schindler's genius lies in bribery, conspiracy, and deception. He didn't know anything about operating a factory, so he found the Jewish accountant Isaac Stein, played by Ben Kingsley, to take charge of this. Steyn walked the streets of Krakow, hiring Jewish recognition for Schindler's factory. Because this is a protected military-industrial enterprise, if you can work there, you can save your life.
Spielberg handled the relationship between Schindler and Steyn very delicately. When the war began, Schindler only wanted to make money, but at the end of the film review, he only wanted to save the'his' Jews. We know that Steyn is very clear about what's going on here, but we have never seen a scene of the two talking about it in the film; this may be because under the circumstances, talking loudly and talking about certain things might call for a murder. disaster.
This kind of delicacy is where Spielberg's strength runs through the film. The script of this film is adapted from a novel by Thomas Kennelly by Steven Zerian. It has no contrived drama at all. On the contrary, Spielberg chose a series of events and presented them clearly and without error. Deliberately'manipulate' emotional issues. Seeing these times, we also understand how secret Schindler and his plan are.
He also presented the massacre before us in a vivid and terrifying way. In the movie, the A'mon-Goss Nazi officer, played by Hugo-Lancaster, is the best case study of evil stupidity. He stood on the Yantai of his villa, overlooking the concentration camp, shooting and killing Jews at will just to practice marksmanship. And Schindler was able to persuade him to give up this habit by catering to his vanity, which Schindler did so obvious, almost as if he was insulting him.
Goss belongs to the kind of fragile hypocrisy who strives to maintain a certain ideal, but excludes himself; on the one hand, he preaches the killing of Jews; on the other hand, he chooses the character played by Alberts-Davidz Helen, the Jew, was a servant girl and fell in love with her. Her compatriots are being destroyed, but she is spared because of his impulsive love. He is not surprised to face such a situation. In his view, his personal needs are more important than right and wrong, survival and destruction.
The film uses black and white photography, and many of the locations used are the actual locations where the scenes were staged. Spielberg shows us how Schindler interacted with the madness of the Nazi system. He bribed, he coaxed, he bragged, and he was finally not seen through. In one of the most daring passages of the film, the train full of his hired workers mistakenly looked at Auschwitz. Schindler personally went to the death camp and boldly persuaded the administrator to let the Jews go and remove them from death. Edge was rescued and put on a train bound for his factory.
The most surprising thing about this film is that Spielberg has served the story so completely. The film can perform "color", write "color", and lead "color", and it also looks very "color". Each individual scene is a masterpiece of art director, photography, special effects, and management of extras. But Spielberg himself, with his outstanding personal style, has many gorgeous shots that deliberately made us pay attention to and remembered in his previous works, but this time he disappeared in his works. Nissen, Kingsley, Lancaster and other actors did not have that kind of dazzling performance. All of them just worked for the same goal.
At the end of the movie, there is a passage full of overwhelming ‘sex’ emotional impact. Those who were rescued by Schindler appeared in person. We learned that Schindler’s Jews and their descendants now have 6,000 people, UU reading and the entire ‘Bo’land’s Jews are only 4,000. This seems to be telling us an obvious truth. Schindler has done more to save Jews than a country. But this conclusion is too simple. The message of this film is that in the face of the Holocaust, one person did certain things, while others were insensitive.
The French writer Gustave Flaubert once wrote that he didn't like'Uncle Tom's cabin' because the author kept preaching against slavery.'Do you have to comment on slavery? , He asked,'Describe it; that's enough.' He added,'The author writes a book' must be like the God in the universe, ubiquitous but imperceptible. This can also be used. On Spielberg, the author of the film.
He described the evil of the Holocaust, and he told an incredible story about how certain people who should have been victims survived. In this process, he did not use the ‘fancy’ tricks of the film industry, those directing and dramatic ‘sexual’ tactics that only evoked ordinary drama-like reactions. In this movie, you can't perceive Spielberg's existence, but in every shot, his restraint and ‘excitement’ are everywhere. "
(Unfinished to be continued. If you like this work, you are welcome to read it and vote for a monthly pass. Your support is the biggest motivation for me to continue to create.
RECENTLY UPDATES
Action
Action
Eastern
Action
Contemporary Romance
Contemporary Romance
Action
Action